Russian gas supplies shipped to Europe via Ukraine plummeted in the first two days of 2020, lifting hub prices and prompting central European countries to ramp up storage withdrawals and off-takes from Norway to compensate for the sharp decrease.
Russian exports to Slovakia
dropped nine-fold from an average 162million cubic metres/day throughout
December to 17mcm/day on 1 January, while volumes on the Ukrainian-Hungarian
border dropped from an average 41mcm/day in December 2019 to 6.8mcm/day on 1
January.
Exports via Drozdowicze on the
Ukrainian – Polish border also fell from an average 10.8mcm daily throughout
December to 8.7mcm on the first day of 2020. The pipeline can flow up to 15mcm
of gas daily.
Flows to Romania via the
Orlovka-Isaccea interconnection point fell from an average 4.3mcm/day
throughout December to 2.5mcm/day on 1 January.
Meanwhile, flows to Bulgaria,
Greece and Turkey were completely diverted from the historical Ukrainian
transit route to TurkStream, a new Russian-spearheaded project which came
online on 1 January.
The fall in exports to Slovakia
and Hungary had a knock-on impact on onward exports to Austria and Italy.
Gas flows at the Austrian-Italian
Tarvisio entry point fell from an average 62.5mcm/day last month to 31.3mcm/day
on 1 January before ticking up to 33.8mcm/day on 2 January.
Meanwhile, exports to the Austrian
Baumgarten hub, fell from an average 128mcm/day in December to 32mcm/day on 2
January.
Despite the sharp decrease in
Russian flows, spot prices on European hubs increased only fractionally with
the benchmark Dutch TTF Day-ahead gaining some €0.10/MWh on Tuesday’s close in
Thursday’s early afternoon trading. Sources said traders may still be adjusting
positions to fluctuations in demand and supply (see separate story)
NEW TRANSIT CONTRACT
Volumes are now exported
under a new five-year transit contract agreed
by Ukraine with Russia’s Gazprom
Sergiy Makogon, the CEO of new
Ukrainian transmission system operator GTSOU said on Thursday that nominations
and matching were being implemented and noted that Gazprom was not nominating
more.
GTSOU had been working against the
clock to secure a new transit deal with Gazprom and to sign interconnection
agreements with neighbouring Hungary, Poland, the Republic of Moldova and
Romania.
A Slovak source told ICIS that the
Ukrainian and Slovak TSOs had also agreed to gradually replace the old legacy
interconnection agreement with a new one to ensure the transition had no
negative impact on markets. Slovakia itself has a transit agreement with Gazprom
which is to expire in 2028.
A source close to Gazprom said the
decrease may not be ‘intended’ but more linked to technicalities or low demand.
European traders polled by ICIS
said they were making alternative arrangements to off-take gas from western Europe
or to withdraw it from storage.
Norwegian inflows were expected to
reach a record high of 116mcm/day on Thursday, according to ICIS-collated
average hourly flow rates. They previously reached that figure only once on 5
December 2019.
On 1 January, the latest data
available to ICIS, storage withdrawals from German facilities were at their
highest since the beginning of winter at 52mcm/day.
Italy was also making alternative
arrangements, ramping up imports at Passo Gries on the Italian-Swiss border from
an average 4.25mcm/day in December to 27mcm/day on 2 January. Volumes were
imported from north-west Europe via Switzerland.
It also raised its storage
withdrawals from an average 75.4mcm/day in December to 111.4mcm/day on 2
January.
A trader attributed the lower
Velke Kapusany throughput on the Ukrainian-Slovak border to Gazprom’s potential
use of its excess storage capacity .
It had stocked up more than double
its usual storage volumes ahead of the Ukraine transit contract expiry, in case
of a supply cut-off. It could drain these volumes before ramping up westbound
flows via Ukraine.
One trader polled by ICIS also
mentioned the start-up of commercial flows via EUGAL, the pipeline link
destined to connect supplies from Nord Stream 2 – expected for completion in
mid-2020 – to Europe.
In the meantime, the EUGAL
operator told ICIS it would fulfil its booked capacity obligations
via connecting pipelines NETRA (Norway), NEL and JAGAL (Russia).
TURKSTREAM CHANGE
Meanwhile, in eastern Europe and
Turkey, flows were completely changed, as volumes which had been historically
exported to Turkey via the Trans-Balkan pipeline across Ukraine, Romania and
Bulgaria were now diverted to TurkStream.
As of 1 January, Turkey started to
receive its gas from TurkStream1, a 15.75 billion cubic metre (bcm)/year
pipeline linking Russia to Turkey via the Black Sea. However, there was no
available data published for the new entry point Kiyikoy in northwest Turkey. A
Turkish market source told ICIS that incumbent BOTAS was unlikely to publish
any flow data at this point. Turkey is not an EU state and therefore is not
under any obligation to comply with transparency requirements.
Turkey was also exporting gas to
neighbouring Bulgaria and Greece via TurkStream2, a parallel 15.75bcm/year
line.
Data published by the Bulgarian
transmission system operator Bulgartransgaz showed that a total of 10mcm/day of
gas entered Bulgaria from Turkey on 1 January 2020.
Romania was expecting to import
gas via the Trans-Balkan pipeline, although as of 1 January it can also
off-take Russian volumes in reverse from Turkey via Bulgaria.