America’s liquefied natural gas exporters are unveiling efforts to slash carbon
emissions from new facilities as they
look to keep the multibillion-dollar
projects on track amid mounting climate pressures.
The US has emerged as an LNG export
powerhouse in recent years following
explosive growth in the country’s
shale oil and gasfields, emboldening
American claims of energy independence and handing Washington a useful
new tool to counter geopolitical foes
such as Russia.
But, for a handful of companies racing
to build new projects that could propel
the nation’s exports yet higher, the global crackdown on emissions and heightened focus on methane pollution from
US oil and gasfields has threatened to
derail their plans.
European efforts to implement a carbon border adjustment tax — which
could levy a fee for higher emitting
imports — is of particular concern for US
LNG companies that compete with Russia, Qatar and others on the continent.
US LNG project developers have
looked to counter the threat by rolling
out plans to install costly equipment to
capture carbon from their facilities,
among other measures such as pledging
to secure gas only from producers monitoring their own emissions.
LNG project developer Venture Global said last week that it planned to
install carbon capture and storage
equipment that could eventually trap as
much as 1m tonnes of CO2 a year from a
new $5.8bn export plant it is building on
the Gulf Coast in Louisiana and another
it hoped to approve this year.
That came after a similar announcement in March from project developer
NextDecade, which said it had added
plans to capture and store about 90 per
cent of the CO2 emissions from its proposed $8bn Rio Grande export site in
Texas. It hopes to make a final investment decision on the project this year.
Carbon capture and storage, where
CO2 is trapped at the site and piped to
natural reservoirs deep underground
for storage, is often touted by the oil and
gas industry as a way to continue pumping fossil fuels even as the global economy decarbonises.
But carbon capture remains costly
and has not yet been deployed widely,
making the US LNG proposals a key test
for the technology.